CFP for ERSS: Problems of method in the social study of energy and climate change
CFP for Energy Research and Social Science
Edited by James Goodman and Jonathan Paul Marshall, University of Technology Sydney
Energy and climate change are intimately related, as the main causes of climate change have to do with the production, politics, organisation and technology of energy. Social processes, rooted in prevailing models of capitalism and development, and the associated patterns of energyproduction and use, are altering world ecology and society. Researching questions of energy transition and climate change, poses profound questions for the methods of both social science and energy research.
This Special Issue aims to explore insights arising from how we go about researching energy and climate change from a social perspective. The questions and dilemmas that arise during research are both significant in themselves, and highly revealing of wider issues. Consequently we ask contributors to begin with their direct experience of undertaking research into the social aspects of energy and climate, and to use that experience, and the problems of method evoked, to explore the conundrums we face as part of a wider society being transformed by climate change and related forms of social action.
There are several matters which immediately call for attention:
- There are questions about the role of interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary or multi-methods research in grappling with interwoven socio-ecological contexts and their different knowledges;
- The extent to which climate and energy research necessarily engages with normative priorities and agendas for political agency, such as the politicization of knowledge;
- The degree to which the abstracted and distanced character of climate change creates conflicts between levels and aspects of social action.
There are also more practical issues such as:
- How to combine ecological processes with social processes;
- How to relate the qualitative experience of climate change with the quantitative ‘big data’ of climate science; and
- Problems of how to build methods of data collection and analysis in complex, multileveled situations.
This list of possible concerns is not meant to be exhaustive, but all these concerns engage, in one way or another, with the wider methodological and epistemological questions of how social scientists can bring the socio-ecological imagination to bear, to address the political relations between energy and climate change, and be sensitive to the consequences of the tools they employ. We are interested in papers from all kinds of social and cross-disciplinary research, including anthropology, economics, social psychology, political economy, statistical sociology, political science, cultural studies, social ecology, human geography, social studies of science and their various combinations.
Ideally papers would show how issues of method or methodology transformed a particular empirical study and opened insights into the nature of the social, and other, dynamics involved.
Abstracts to be in by August 1st, 2017. Notification of acceptance by August 15th, 2017.
Papers due by November 1st, 2017, or earlier.
Final decision: June 1st, 2018.
Publication around July, 2018.